It is conceivable that remodeling the conceptual structure of German law in this way effected a profound transformation of its underlying normative substance. But it seems more plausible that this process involved the abductive extraction and refinement of normative principles immanent within the legal corpus, which ultimately received more transparent articulation in the form of the general legal principles laid down by the BGB. In my view, common law causes of action such as negligence and defamation ought to be understood in the same way. The pigeonholes of pre-BGB German tort law were coarse remedial devices whose underlying moral principles were never perspicuously disclosed by their formal structure. That these causes of action were named after various forms of relational wrongdoing did not indicate that relational wrongdoing was their basic moral concern. So, too, the common law torts are remedial legal pigeonholes — legal formulas for obtaining judicial relief — that, notwithstanding their surface form, are largely concerned with tracking a defendant’s moral responsibility for infringing a plaintiff’s rights and with enforcing the resulting moral liabilities to provide compensation or other forms of remedial relief.
Ранее в Институте нефтехимического синтеза имени А. В. Топчиева в Москве во время эксперимента произошел взрыв. В результате пострадал сотрудник НИИ. Подробности о его должности и травмах не приводились.
，详情可参考搜狗输入法
强化要素保障 护航企业敢闯敢试
Верховный суд разрешил возбудить дело в отношении ростовского судьи Маслова14:48
Студент спасся от леопарда и забил его насмерть камнями20:49